Case Information: 11-CO-0077 | |||
Short Caption: | DARRELL A. NELSON V. UNITED STATES | Classification: | Appeals - Criminal Other - Other Criminal |
Lead: | 11-CO-0077 | Consolidated: | 11-CO-0078 |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | FEL10780-89 | Filed Date: | 01/21/2011 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 01/21/2011 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 04/20/2011 | ||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Appellant | Darrell A. Nelson | Y | |||||||
Appellee | United States | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
01/21/2011 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
02/10/2011 | ORDERED, SS, that appeals nos 10CO77 & 10CO78 are CONSOLIDATED FOR ALL PURPOSES herein. It is *****MORE***** | |||
02/10/2011 | FURTHER ORDERED that APPELLANT SHALL w/n 20 days from the date of this order, SHOW CAUSE why these appeals should not be dismissed for having been taken from a non-appealable order since denials of motions to dismiss indictments on grounds other than double jeopardy...are NON APPEALABLE. (BY: ETW) | |||
02/10/2011 | TMC - OTSC - ROTSC | |||
03/16/2011 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - to court order (titled as: memo of law in support of motion to dismiss indictment for F.R.Cr. P.6 violations, and motion to inspect list of names of qualified grand jurors who voted the indictment) | |||
03/29/2011 | ORDERED, SS, that the APPEALS ARE HEREBY DISMISSED since by entering his plea, appellant waived the issues concerning his indictment...SEE HARDCOPY (GLPRFE) (rl) | |||
03/29/2011 | DISMISSED | |||
04/20/2011 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||
07/12/2011 | Filed | Copy/Notice Of Petition For Writ Of Certiorari (Appellant) | ||
10/11/2011 | Filed | Notice Of Denial Of Pet. For Writ Of Certiorari on October 3, 2011 (Appellant) | Denied | |
01/23/2012 | Filed | Notice Of Denial Of Pet. For rehearing from Supreme Court (Appellant) |