judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

THOMAS WALKER V. EAGLE MAINTENANCE

Case Information: 05-AA-1308
Short Caption:THOMAS WALKER V. EAGLE MAINTENANCEClassification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ESP102272-05Filed Date:11/14/2005

Opening Event Date:11/14/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:07/31/2006Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:11/09/2006
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerThomas Walker YPro SeN
RespondentEagle MaintenanceN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
11/14/2005PETITION FOR REVIEW (nunc pro tunc)
11/14/2005PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
12/06/2005ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to November 14, 2005. It is F/ORDERED that the Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the administrative record w/in 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16(a)(4). It is F/ORDERED that Eagle Maintenace shall w/in 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resoures, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (ETW)
12/06/2005CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD & DOES.
12/27/2005 On consideration of this court's order of December 6, 2005, which directed respondent to identify its counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent being prohibited from filing its brief. (MWF) elp
01/06/2006LETTER - from respondent re: identity of counsel per December 6, 2005 order (The identified counsel is not a lawyer. Notified appellee) ta.
07/11/2006 On consideration fo the court's order of Dec. 6, 2005, directing respondent to identify its counsel within 15 days from the date of the order and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 10 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 2001); D.C. App. R. 15(a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent prohibited from filing its brief. (ETW)
07/26/2006RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE - to court order
07/31/2006RECORD ON APPEAL
07/31/2006RECORD COMPLETED
08/08/2006 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
09/22/2006 On consideration of this court's order of August 8, 2006, directing petitioner to file the brief, and the limited appendix, as required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that the brief and the appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of petitioner and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP)
10/17/2006 On consideration of this court's order of September 22, 2006, directing petitioner to submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time, and it appearing that petitioner has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this petition for review is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (ETW)
10/17/2006DISMISSED
11/09/2006MANDATE ISSUED
12/29/2006PETITIONER'S MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL
01/23/2007 On consideration of petitioner's motion to reinstate this petition for review, and it appearing that this court dismissed this matter for petitioner's failure to file his brief and the limited appendix, it is ORDERED that petitioner's biref and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the denial of petitioner's motion to reinstate. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to reinstate is hereby held in abeyance pending further order of this court. (ETW)
03/01/2007 On consideration of this court's January 23, 2007 order, which held in abeynace petitioner's motion to reinstate, and directed petitioner to submit the brief and limited appendix within 20 days from teh date of the order, and it appearing that petitioner has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that petitioner's motion to reinstate is hereby denied. (ETW)