judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY V. DC DEP'T OF EMP. SVCS.

Case Information: 05-AA-1290
Short Caption:TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY V. DC DEP'T OF EMP. SVCS.Classification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Worker's Compensation
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CRB56-03Filed Date:11/10/2005

Opening Event Date:11/10/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:01/17/2006Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:08/03/2006
Argued/Submitted:03/20/2007
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:08/03/2009

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
IntervenorVertrans, Inc.N
David A. Slacter YN
PetitionerTravelers Indemnity Company of IllinoisN
D. Stephenson SchwinnNY
David B. StrattonYY
Anjuma K. Goswami NN
RespondentD.C. Department of Employment Services - Worker's Comp.N
Edward E. SchwabNY
Todd S. KimNY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
11/10/2005PETITION FOR REVIEW
11/10/2005FILING FEE OF $100.00 PAID
11/15/2005CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD (Compensation Review Board - Labor Standards Bureau, DOES) and to the Office of Attorney General Att: Edward Schwab.
01/17/2006RECORD ON APPEAL(jj)
01/17/2006RECORD COMPLETED
01/31/2006APPEARANCE- of Anjuma K. Goswami & David B. Stratton on behalf of petitoner
02/01/2006 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. ((GP) elp
02/22/2006PETITIONER'S MOTION TO stay briefing schedule. no oppo ta
03/02/2006ORDERD that the motion is granted and the briefing order issued on February 1, 2006, is hereby stayed pending further order of this court. It is F/ORDERED that while the briefing remains stayed, counsel for petitioner shall advise this court every 60 days as to the status of the en banc review, and within 15 days of the issuance of a decision by the review board. (ETW)
05/03/2006LETTER from appellant regarding the status of the En Banc review of related case.
05/16/2006 On consideratiion of petitioner's letter filed with this court on April 28, 2006, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
06/26/2006PETITIONER'S BRIEF
06/26/2006APPENDIX
07/24/2006MEMORANDUM/STATEMENT IN LIEU OF BRIEF d.c.
07/31/2006RECEIVED - intervenor's brief
07/31/2006APPEARANCE - David A. Slacter on behalf of intervenor
07/31/2006MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE - of Vertran, Inc.
08/03/2006BRIEFS COMPLETED
08/03/2006On consideration of the motion of Vertran's, Inc. for leave to intervene to which no opposition has been filed, and the lodged brief of intervenor, it is ORDERED that the motion for leave is granted and the Clerk shall enter the appearance of Vertrans, inc. as an intervenor in this matter. It is F/O that the Clerk shall file the lodged brief of intervenor. It is F/O that this petition for review shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division as soon as the calendar permits. (MWF)
08/03/2006INTERVENOR'S BRIEF
08/03/2006APPEARANCE of Davis B. Stratton, Esquire as counsel for intervenor Vertrans, Inc.
08/14/2006FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
08/28/2006PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF
11/21/2006 It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of February 2007 through March 2007, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by December 11, 2006, of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk
12/08/2006LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
12/11/2006LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING petitioner
02/02/2007CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
03/20/2007FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
03/20/2007ARGUED before Judges Washington, Ruiz, Farrell D. Stephenson Schwinn, Esq. for petitioner David A. Slacter, Esq. for intervenor
04/23/2008STATEMENT- supplemental memorandum of aplt
04/23/2008CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28
05/19/2008CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28
07/09/2009AFFIRMED Opinion (Washington, Ruiz, Farrell) and Judgment affirming the order of the Compensation Review Board dismissing the intervenor's appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
08/03/2009MANDATE ISSUED