judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

STEWART ANTHONY RICE V. JEROME WALKER

Case Information: 05-CV-1279
Short Caption:STEWART ANTHONY RICE V. JEROME WALKERClassification:Appeals - Civil - Landlord And Tenant
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:LTB20186-05Filed Date:10/26/2005

Opening Event Date:10/26/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:02/06/2006
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantStewart Anthony Rice YPro SeN
AppelleeJerome Walker N
Ronnie ThaxtonNN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
10/26/2005NOTICE OF APPEAL
11/29/2005ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-appealable order. See Finkelstein, Thompson & Loughran v. Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc. 774 A.2d 332, 339 (d.C. 2001). (BY: ETW)
11/29/2005TMC - OTSC
12/21/2005 On consideration of this court's November 29, 2005, show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-appealable order and there appearing to be no response thereto and it further appearing that appellant is proceeding in forma pauperis, it is ORDERED that the appeal is HEREBY DEEMED AS TAKEN FROM THE September 26, 2005, order since any attempt to appeal the August 12, 2005, judgment or September 15, 2005, order is untimely. It is *****MORE*****
12/21/2005 F/ORDERED that appellant shall within 10 days from the date of this order file with the Appeals Coordinator's Office a request for preparation of transcripts of proceedings in the Superior Court, on motion with notice, to the appropriate motions or trial judge, for determination in accordance with Hancock v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 472 A.2d 867 (D.C. 1984). See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(5)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall simultaneously file a copy of that motion with this court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (TENEST)
01/13/2006 ORDERED that this appeal is HEREBY DISMISSED. See D.C. App. R. 13. (BY: ETW) lw
01/13/2006DISMISSED
02/06/2006MANDATE ISSUED