GAFAAR ELFAKI V. ADMIRAL SECURITY

Case Information: 05-AA-0002
Short Caption:	GAFAAR ELFAKI V. ADMIRAL SECURITY	Classification:	Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:	ESP100078-04	Filed Date:	01/07/2005
Opening Event Date:	01/07/2005	Case Status:	Closed
Record Completed:	04/22/2005	Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:		Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:	09/07/2005
		Costs Waived

Events
Event Date	Status	Description	Result
01/07/2005		PETITION FOR REVIEW (Nunc Pro Tunc)
01/07/2005		PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
02/22/2005		ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and the petitioner shall proceed in forma pauperis. It is F/O that the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to January 7, 2005. It is F/O that the Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the record on appeal wihtin 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. It is F/O that respondent shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc., v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304, (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15(a)(5). (BY: AMW)
04/22/2005		RECORD ON APPEAL
04/22/2005		RECORD COMPLETED
04/26/2005		It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (BY: GPJ)
06/09/2005		On consideration of this court's order of April 26, 2005, which directed petitioner to file the brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), within 40 days from the dte of the order, and it appering that the brief and the limited appendix have not been filed, and it further appearing that respondent's statement regarding the identity of its counsel was due to be filed on or before March 9, 2005, and respondent has failed to comply, it is ORDERED that petitioner shall within 20 days from the date of this order submit the brief andthe limited appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. It is F/O that respondent shall within 15 days form the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15(a)(5). (BY: GPJ)
06/22/2005		APPEARANCE - of counsel Michael A. Dymersky who will represent respondent (Admiral Security)
07/26/2005		RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL
08/15/2005		On consideration of respondent's motion to dismiss, and this court's order of June 9, 2005, which directed petitioner to file the brief and the appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave within 20 days from the date of the order, and further stated that failure to comply withthe order would subject this case to dismissal without further notice, and it appearing that the documents have not been filed, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and this petition for review is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13, 20. (BY: ETW)
08/15/2005		DISMISSED
09/07/2005		MANDATE ISSUED