Case Information: 05-BG-0001 | |||
Short Caption: | IN RE: CHARLES R. KNIGHT | Classification: | Bar Governance - Bar - Disciplinary Reciprocal |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | BDN286-04 | Filed Date: | 01/04/2005 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 01/04/2005 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Petitioner | Bar Counsel | N |
| |||||||||
Petitioner | Board on Professional Responsibility | N |
| |||||||||
Respondent | Charles R. Knight | N | Pro Se | N |
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
01/04/2005 | DISCIPLINARY LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel with a certified copy of an order of the State of Connecticut, Statewide Grievance Committee, imposing reprimand on respondent. | |||
01/12/2005 | ORDER It appearing that the Court has received a certified copy of an order of the State of Connecticut, Statewide Grievance Committee, imposing reprimand on respondent, it is accordingly, pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, Sec 11 (d), ORDERED that Bar Counsel inform the Board on Professional Responsibility of his position regarding reciprocal discipline within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, respondent shall show cause before the Board on Professional Responsibility, if cause there be, within 10 days why identical, greater or lesser discipline should not be imposed in the District of Columbia. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Board on Professional Responsibility is directed to recommend promptly thereafter to this court whether identical, greater or lesser discipline should be imposed as reciprocal discipline or whether the Board instead elects to proceed de novo pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, Sec 11. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall cause a copy of this order and the order of the State of Connecticut, Statewide Grievance Committee to be directed to the Chair of the Board on Professional Responsibility and transmitted to to respondent. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Bar Counsel advise the Court if the matter is concluded without the necessity of further court action. AMW | |||
01/27/2005 | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel with a certified copy of an order of the State of Michigan Attorney Discipline Board imposing reprimand on respondent. The Michigan action is based on an order of the State of Connecticut Statewide Grievance Commission, which was previously reported. | |||
04/22/2005 | ORDER of the Board on Professional Responsibility reprimanding respondent. | |||
04/28/2005 | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel taking no exception to the order of the Board on Professional Responsibility imposing a reprimand on respondent. | |||
05/23/2005 | DISMISSED On consideration of the order of the Board on Professional Responsibility dated April 22, 2005, which disposed of this matter pursuant to D.C. BAr Rule XI, Sec 4 (e)(8), and the letter dated April 28, 2005, from Bar Counsel taking no exception to the order issued by the Board on Professional Responsibility, it is ORDERED that this matter is hereby closed. (AMW) |