judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

BENJAMIN RAMEY V. PEPCO

Case Information: 06-CV-1089
Short Caption:BENJAMIN RAMEY V. PEPCOClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB5435-06Filed Date:08/25/2006

Opening Event Date:08/25/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:01/19/2007Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:06/13/2007
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:07/19/2007

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantBenjamin Ramey NPro SeN
AppelleePotomac Electric Power CompanyN
M. Carter Delorme NN
Connie N. Bertram YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
08/25/2006NOTICE OF APPEAL
10/03/2006 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on August 25, 2006, it is ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attach ed statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (GP) elp
10/05/2006STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (NO RT NEEDED FOR THIS APPEAL) elp
11/27/2006APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL
12/19/2006 On consideration of appellee's motion to dismiss, and it appearing that appellant has filed the statement regarding transcript, and it further appearing that no transcript is needed forthis appeal, it is ORDERED that appellee's motion to dismiss appeal is denied. It is FURTHER ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record index in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (ETW) elp
01/19/2007RECORD INDEX
01/19/2007RECORD COPIES
01/19/2007RECORD COMPLETED
04/18/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App.R. 31. (GP) elp
05/14/2007APPELLANT'S BRIEF
05/14/2007APPENDIX- aplt
06/08/2007APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL
06/12/2007TMC - appellee's motion to dismiss as moot - opposition
06/13/2007APPELLEE'S BRIEF
06/13/2007BRIEFS COMPLETED
06/19/2007APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION - to aple's motion to dismiss
06/22/2007FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
06/26/2007 ORDERED that appellee's MOTION TO DISMISS the appeal as MOOT is GRANTED. Yates V. D.C., 868, A.2d 866, 866 (D.C. 2005) (citations omitted). (BY: ETW) lw
06/26/2007DISMISSED
07/19/2007MANDATE ISSUED
09/27/2013FiledArchived