judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

EASTBANC, INC. V. GEORGETOWN PARK ASSOCIATES II, ETAL

Case Information: 06-CV-1092
Short Caption:EASTBANC, INC. V. GEORGETOWN PARK ASSOCIATES II, ETALClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB2291-06Filed Date:09/12/2006

Opening Event Date:09/12/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:10/17/2006Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:12/22/2006
Argued/Submitted:09/19/2007
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:02/11/2008

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantEastbanc IncN
Seth Paul Waxman YN
Stephen A. BogoradNY
AppelleeGeorgetown Park Associates IiN
S. Scott MorrisonYN
AppelleeHerbert S. Miller N
S. Scott MorrisonYN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
09/12/2006NOTICE OF APPEAL
09/21/2006STATEMENT - from aplt of issues filed pursuant to D.C. Court of Appeals Rule 10(b) (3)(a)
09/21/2006STATEMENT - of aplt certificate as to transcripts filed pursuant to D.C. Court of Appeals Rule 10 (b)(b) (NO TRANSCRIPTS NEEDED FOR THIS APPEAL) elp
10/03/2006 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on September 12, 2006, and it appearing that no transcript is needed for this appeal, it is ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record index in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (GP) elp
10/17/2006RECORD INDEX
10/17/2006RECORD COMPLETED
10/19/2006 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellees' brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp
10/26/2006 On consideration of the notices of appeal filed in these matters, and it appearing that the notice of appeal in no. 06-CV-1156 is a duplicate of the notice of appeal in no. 06-CV-1092, it is ORDERED, sua sponte, that appeal no. 06-CV-1156 is dismissed as duplicative of appeal no. o6-CV-1092. It is (ETW) elp
11/28/2006APPELLANT'S BRIEF
11/28/2006APPENDIX
12/05/2006RECEIVED - aplt's amended certificate of service for brief and appendix
12/22/2006APPELLEES' BRIEF - Georgetown Park Associates II and Herbert S. Miller
12/22/2006BRIEFS COMPLETED
01/17/2007APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF
02/02/2007FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
02/02/2007 It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of April 2007 through June 2007, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by February 19, 2007 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk
02/06/2007LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING in response to this Court's 2/2/07 order
02/12/2007LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aplt
02/16/2007LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
07/24/2007LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aple
07/30/2007CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
08/01/2007APPELLANT'S MOTION TO POSTPONE/CONTINUE ARGUMENT (no oppo)
08/09/2007On consideration of appellant's unopposed motion to re-schedule oral argument, and it appearing that this matter is scheduled on the Regular Calendar of September 13, 2007, it is ORDERED on behalf of the merits division assigned to consider this matter that the motion is granted and this matter is removed from the calendar of September 13, 2007, and re-scheduled for argument as a special sitting on the Regular Calendar on September 19, 2007, at 2:00 p.m. The parties are to be present in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals courtroom, located on the sixth floor, at 1:55 p.m. on that date. (GP)
09/14/2007MISCELLANEOUS - revised disclosure of aplt pursuant to d.c. court of appeals rule 28 a 2
09/19/2007FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
09/19/2007ARGUED before Judges Farrell, Reid, Fisher Seth Paul Waxman, Esq. for Appellant S. Scott Morrison, Esq. for Appellee
09/24/2007COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS aplt Granted
09/26/2007On consideration of the motion of Andrew R. Varcoe, Esquire, to withdraw as counsel for appellant, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the appearance of Andrew R. Varcoe, Esquire, is hereby withdrawn as counsel for appellant. (FA,RD,FI)
01/17/2008REVERSED AND REMANDED Opinion (Farrell, Reid, Fisher) and Judgment reversing the judgment on appeal and remanding the case for further proceedings.
02/11/2008MANDATE ISSUED